<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Religulous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/review-religulous-467.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/review-religulous-467.htm</link>
	<description>Created by an ex-Jehovah&#039;s Witness turned atheist, Atheist Geek News is both funny and moderately informative.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Atheist Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/review-religulous-467.htm/comment-page-1#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>The Atheist Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/?p=467#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Glad to have you back for a visit. And I like your site, too. A lot of the stuff I see online by ex-Witnesses is heavy with the bitterness and light on helpful advice. Yours is not. Plus, you&#039;re an atheist too. 

How could I NOT link to your site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to have you back for a visit. And I like your site, too. A lot of the stuff I see online by ex-Witnesses is heavy with the bitterness and light on helpful advice. Yours is not. Plus, you&#8217;re an atheist too. </p>
<p>How could I NOT link to your site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirusHead</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/review-religulous-467.htm/comment-page-1#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistgeeknews.com/?p=467#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Hey - thanks for the link love here. Very nice!

Most interesting to me was that Religulous seemed to track a movement in Maher&#039;s own thoughts. In the first part of the film, he kept trying to pull something authentically spiritual and ethical from the discussions - to make distinctions between the claims and something that could still be salvaged. By the end of the film, he had given up - the major beliefs and practices - and the ways that believers were manipulated - were so toxic that he could only condemn. 

It was worth it for me just to see Maher standing in Megiddo! I&#039;m just waiting for someone to act out the script and send a blue-turbaned hack through the gates astride a donkey...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; thanks for the link love here. Very nice!</p>
<p>Most interesting to me was that Religulous seemed to track a movement in Maher&#8217;s own thoughts. In the first part of the film, he kept trying to pull something authentically spiritual and ethical from the discussions &#8211; to make distinctions between the claims and something that could still be salvaged. By the end of the film, he had given up &#8211; the major beliefs and practices &#8211; and the ways that believers were manipulated &#8211; were so toxic that he could only condemn. </p>
<p>It was worth it for me just to see Maher standing in Megiddo! I&#8217;m just waiting for someone to act out the script and send a blue-turbaned hack through the gates astride a donkey&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

