Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Have A Pedophile Problem?

Jehovah's Witnesses and pedophiliaDo Jehovah’s Witnesses have a pedophile problem? I will let the following sources of information answer that question for me. You can also read the full article at Michigan Skeptics. The sheer volume of it – including advocacy groups in multiple countries – says plenty.

It should be noted that the Watchtower Society has, in various ways and at different times, put information out to the public regarding its official stance on child abuse. Their statements are, as with most things, pretty devoid of meaning and full of obfuscation. Nothing has really changed. Nothing good at any rate. Internally, the organization seems to have dug in its heels even deeper than before.

Jehovah’s Witnesses Pedophile Policy: Jehovah’s Witnesses Pedophile Policy

Many have been disfellowshipped (excommunicated and shunned) from Jehovah’s Witnesses without any or with little possibility of defend themselves just because they tried to stand up for molested children and protect them from pedophiles within Jehovah’s Witnesses organization.

If you question Jehovah’s Witnesses about these things you cannot rely on them telling the truth not even in the court. “While malicious lying is definitely condemned in the Bible, this does not mean that a person is under obligation to divulge truthful information to people who are not entitled to it.” – Insight-2 p. 245

Do Jehovah’s Witnesses protect pedophiles within the organization? Yes, they do. The policy of Jehovah’s Witnesses is that if a congregation has a known pedophile only a few of the elders in the congregation knows about it. Today the elders, that know they have pedophiles in their congregation, are not allowed to warn and protect the congregation. This is the current policy of the Watch Tower.

Watchtower Paedophile Policy and related court cases

There have been several reasons that paedophiles have been able to find sanctuary amongst Jehovah’s Witnesses and that the Watchtower Society is now being held accountable for the actions of its members. Most damaging, and described in detail below, were the following:

The two witness rule to establish Scriptural crimes

The three year rule for sins of elders

Other concepts also at play have been:

Worldly wisdom cannot be trusted

Reproach must not be bought on Jehovah’s Organization – Witnesses are expected to solve problems within

Everyone must engage in preaching

Since 1997, there has been improvement in Watchtower policies regarding child abuse, particularly due to pressure from the media and legal cases, and included are the latest Watchtower regulations for each point.

New evidence in Jehovah’s Witness allegations

The Jehovah’s Witnesses have settled nine lawsuits alleging church policies protected men who sexually abused children for many years.

Expose on Jehovah Witnesses Pedophile Cover-Up

Silentlambs.org

Inside sources reveal 23,720 reported/unreported child molesters on file at Jehovah’s Witness headquarters in New York

JW Survivors

JW Survivors is a volunteer not-for-profit community based victim advocacy group for survivors of the Church of Jehovah’s Witnesses within Australia. The group was founded by Steven Unthank. The seeds of JW Survivors were planted by current and former members of the Church of Jehovah’s Witnesses, and their families, in response to the Victorian Inquiry into the Handling of Child Abuse by Religious and other Organisations, and an extensive submission made in relation to the Church of Jehovah’s Witnesses and their administrative controlling corporation, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia.

Pedophile Cover-up « Jehovahs Witnesses Revealed

Jehovah’s Witness Pedophile Cover UP

Jehovah’s Witness pedophile walked free from court despite one of his victims was a baby

Legal Loophole Used by Jehovah’s Witnesses to Avoid Moral Obligation

Jehovah’s Witnesses ordered to pay $21 million in child sex abuse case

Child Abuse | JW Leaks

Documents and court cases relating to child abuse within the church of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Spiritwatch Unchained: Organized To Accomplish Their Molestation: A Spiritwatch Real Video Presentation On Pedophilia Among Jehovah’s Witnesses

JW Class Action | official information site

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: December 1, 2012

$3 Billion class action lawsuit on behalf of Jehovah’s Witnesses children

A $3 Billion class action lawsuit is being launched in Australia on behalf of up to 6,160 children within the Church of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Documents relating to the class action reveal over 14,000 serious criminal breaches of mandatory child protection laws, committed against these children by elders and “ministers of religion” within the Church of Jehovah’s Witnesses over the past 4 years.

Candace Conti | JW Leaks

Documents and court records relating to the case of “Candace Conti v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York”.

About The Atheist Geek

The Atheist Geek is a former Jehovah's Witness turned secular humanist. He's a lifelong sci-fi geek and a writer wannabe.
Tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Have A Pedophile Problem?

  1. Pingback: What You Don’t Know About Jehovah’s Witnesses And Pedophiles | Michigan Skeptics Association

  2. Sarah says:

    “Elders” are the same as “preachers” “priests” “reverends” as far as the law is concerned and therefore are NOT AUTHORIZED to report child abuse, just as any other of the clergy (or lawyers or phsychiatrists) are. A person who abuses a child is removed from the congregation but it is up to the victim to take legal action

    • This isn’t true AFAIK. It’s the law in many states that they have to report such cases. In some situations, it is required even if it is merely suspected that the person may commit pedophilia in the future. The Society’s internal memos only authorize elders to report these cases in states where it is mandatory and even then, only after they receive permission from the Society. I am not a lawyer, but this is how I understand it. The fact that the Society also refers to this in correspondence would seem to suggest it is correct. But ultimately, I’m afraid you’ll have to argue legal points with the authorities. You could contact the lawyers handling some of the cases. In any event, this isn’t even the key problem.

      The Society’s rules make it easy to be a pedophile and suffer no consequences. That’s the problem. Pedophiles won’t be removed unless they confess or are caught in the act thanks to the 2-person rule. Pedophiles don’t usually commit a crime where others will see them, obviously. So unless 2 people admit it happened, nothing will happen even if the elders suspect the accused is guilty. The victim and his/her parents, however, will be disfellowshipped if they report the crime to the authorities after the elders couldn’t find the accused guilty within the boundaries of the Society’s rules. The victims and their families would be seen as slandering the other person and turning to “worldly” authorities instead of keeping it in the congregation. This is a disfellowshipping offense. This is what happened in the Candace Conti case; she and her mother were DFed for reporting her own molestation. And it’s completely pointless and unnecessary.

  3. One of the links provided in the article has legal information about this. (Did you read the article or check out any of the links?) http://www.silentlambs.org/assistance/legal.cfm

  4. Yet more information about the legalities of reporting pedophiles, especially with regard to places where it is mandated. https://www.childwelfare.gov/responding/mandated.cfm To Sarah, I have to say that your post sort of makes it sound like you think reporting this is against the law. I’m glad to see that this is not the case. Certainly not in most places.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>